Asterion Labs markAsterion Labs

04 · Asterion Labs

The written
record.

Every retained theory is published with its derivation, its datasets and the engine version that produced it. Machine authorship is disclosed explicitly on each paper.

  • Abstract

    We present a fully autonomous pipeline in which candidate gravitational Lagrangians are proposed, symbolically constrained and confronted with cosmological likelihoods without human intervention. Across 1.4 × 10⁶ candidates, 63 survived dimensional, causal and weak-field consistency filters; four exceeded the ΛCDM evidence baseline.

    Authors

    • E. Vasquez-Rhee
    • T. Okonkwo
    • M. Lindqvist
    • Asterion Engine v4.2

    Datasets

    Planck 2018DESI DR2Euclid Q1
  • Abstract

    Machine-proposed w(z) parameterisations are ranked by Bayesian evidence rather than goodness of fit. We find a family of relaxation models that mildly prefer phantom crossing near z ≈ 0.7, reducing the Hubble tension to 2.6σ without invoking early-universe modifications.

    Authors

    • S. Marchetti
    • A. Duval
    • Asterion Engine v4.1

    Datasets

    Pantheon+DESI DR2 BAOSPT-3G
  • Abstract

    Scientific credibility of automated discovery depends on traceability. We describe a derivation-graph representation in which every accepted theory retains its assumptions, intermediate transformations and rejected siblings, enabling full replay of the reasoning that produced it.

    Authors

    • T. Okonkwo
    • R. Beaumont
    • H. Yasuda

    Datasets

    Internal derivation corpus
  • Abstract

    We formulate theory exploration as a compute market and allocate accelerators by expected reduction in cosmological parameter entropy. The scheduler yields a 4.3× improvement in discovered-evidence per GPU-hour over uniform allocation.

    Authors

    • M. Lindqvist
    • K. Abadi
    • Asterion Engine v3.7

    Datasets

    Synthetic likelihood suite
  • Abstract

    Generative models readily produce dimensionally invalid physics. We introduce a tensor-algebraic verification layer enforcing gauge invariance, causality and correct classical limits, rejecting 99.98% of proposals prior to any numerical simulation.

    Authors

    • A. Duval
    • E. Vasquez-Rhee

    Datasets

    Formal physics corpus v2